by John Bursill source: Visiblity 9/11 Jan 16, 2011
This timely and important Podcast is a MUST listen!
David, who describes himself as a pacifist, talks in great depth about his journey on the campaign for 9/11 Truth and Justice to which he is passionately dedicated. Many of you may be aware that it was David who is credited with getting NIST to admit that WTC Building 7 fell at a an acceleration consistent with freefall due to gravity, which I and many others view as the single most powerful debating tool for us as 9/11 Truth advocates. David disputes that he is solely responsible for this and says that Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan and others were central to this achievement but it was his question that drew the answer in the end so it seems. David also talks about the highly political timing and nature of the NIST Building 7 report.
We then move on to talk about David’s new DVD, 9/11 Analysis, which is comprised of a compilation of his most powerful work to date and some new material into one concise resource. This DVD is available for sale now and can be purchased here.
From the site:
“The 9/11 Analysis DVD project is a compilation of the many short analysis videos David Chandler has produced and uploaded to the internet over the last few years, woven together with an interpretive narrative. The current release is in English, but the plan is to follow this with a multilingual release. We need to raise funds to cover the production costs to make Phase II a reality. Please order your copy now and/or help out with a donation.”
In the second part of this frank and informative interview, David talks about his strong stance on the Pentagon fiasco that is now threatening the whole credible body of 9/11 research. The aggressive nature of the advocates of “no plane hit the Pentagon” has lead to a situation that is already out of control as has been seen by Jesse Ventura’s terrible error of judgment with his episode of Conspiracy Theory for True TV on this subject. The case made by David for us not to be seen as a “Pentagon Movement” for it could mean our destruction is the best I’ve heard to date.
For David’s analysis of the Pentagon Debate please see his and Jon Cole’s page dedicated to the issue:
Here is an excerpt: “The Honey Pot – On the other hand the mystery that surrounds the Pentagon makes it an attractive target of speculation and the subject of truly wild conspiracy theories. (This kind of attractive diversion is sometimes called a “honey pot,” a “setup” to be discredited at a later time.) This is not the only instance of theories that seem designed to be easily discredited. There are groups that insist the towers at the World Trade Center were taken down by space lasers. Others claim no planes hit the Twin Towers at all: they were just holograms. What better way to tar the movement than to seed it with absurdly false theories that fuel a media circus, while making the Movement look ridiculous?”