NIST Cumulus FOIA: 9/11 Ground Zero After Midnight

Nor Cal Truth    Nov 9, 2010

A sad scene from what appears to be the night of 9/11  as rescue workers work tirelessly looking  for survivors and their fellow firefighters who were in the buildings during their destruction.

Amazingly, after 220 stories of buildings “collapsed” into the streets right below, the streets were quite walkable for the rescue personnel. Shouldn’t there be a massive pile of a building, TIMES 2?

At the 6:58 mark there seems to be a very bright glow. It appears to be molten red hot metal in the mid-ground of the camera frame once the camera zooms in. Though no one seems to agree with me on that.

RAW NIST FOIA Cumulus Release #14 WNBC Dub 4 Clips 24-76 in order combined.

Support the efforts of the International Center for 9/11 Studies, they are currently trying to receive more RAW data via FOIA requests.

This section uploaded by YouTube user IranContraScumdid911

4 Responses to NIST Cumulus FOIA: 9/11 Ground Zero After Midnight

  1. Craig Welbourn says:

    I’m with you that 9/11 was an inside job. But I think this fire at 6:58 is a regular fire of debris burning, maybe initially fueled by something like gasoline from the car. The real molten metal is under the debris at ground zero, the result perhaps of melting the steel substructure of the buildings. These burned for over three months. But continue with your vigilance.

    • Brian says:

      I think that it looks like a red hot metal, not molten. But many do not agree with me. I’m ok with being wrong, I can admit it.

      Fortunately there is enough evidence of molten metals, and explosions, therefore arguing one way or the other is moot.

      Thanks Craig, and have a great day!

    • Jess says:

      “Second, THE SAME MEDIA that exposed the Clinton bolojwb scandal? A GUY CAN’T EVEN GET A BLOWJOB IN THE PRIVACY OF THE OVAL FUCKING OFFICE without the media finding out about it, and yet they will WILLINGLY coverup an “inside job” to murder 3000 americans?”Excellent and interesting point. Do you know why? First, it’s not even in the same ballpark as 9/11, and it limits the damage to one party only. It is therefore a perfect partisan witch hunt.As soon as something has the potential to damage both parties, it gets covered up much quicker, because there is no vested interest to follow through. Get it?Second, you seem to imply that the media hasn’t broken any significant 9/11 stories. They have. There is a massive amount of revelations that the truth movement draws on that come straight from the mainstream media. See I see to remember an excellent documentary about Ali Mohamed, and they basically laid it all out, albeit with some apologetic bullshit by Jack Cloonan.Third, do you realize the difference between American and foreign media? They report different things. Go watch Canadian media for a while. Or British media. Or Russian media. See what they say about the States. Conversely, American media will say things Russian media will bury. (I still prefer American media there, Russia is one horrible totalitarian nightmare)Can you explain away the discrepancy by claiming all foreign media are anti-American? Or that they don’t understand America like American media? Or is there a culture of “flaming tires” as Dan Rather put it?The media DOES censor shit, which is why there are independent media trying to counter that. However, it’s not a black and white issue, so stop trying to frame it as such.

    • I suppose that sounds and smells just about right.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: