H.R. 847, James Zadroga 9/11 Health Bill Rejected by House Vote

“To pay the bill’s estimated $7.4 billion cost over 10 years, the legislation would have prevented foreign multinational corporations incorporated in tax haven countries from avoiding tax on income earned in the U.S.”

To those who voted no: You are disgusting. You are criminal.

source: AP      July 29, 2010

A bill that would have provided up to $7.4 billion in aid to people sickened by World Trade Center dust fell short in the House on Thursday, raising the possibility that the bulk of compensation for the ill will come from a legal settlement hammered out in the federal courts.

The bill would have provided free health care and compensation payments to 9/11 rescue and recovery workers who fell ill after working in the trade center ruins.

It failed to win the needed two-thirds majority, 255-159. The vote was largely along party lines, with 12 Republicans joining Democrats supporting the measure.

For weeks, a judge and teams of lawyers have been urging 10,000 former ground zero workers to sign on to a court-supervised settlement that would split $713 million among people who developed respiratory problems and other illnesses after inhaling trade center ash.

The court deal shares some similarities with the aid program that the federal legislation would have created, but it involves far less money. Only the most seriously ill of the thousands of police officers, firefighters and construction workers suing New York City over their exposure to the dust would be eligible for a hefty payout.

But supporters of the deal have been saying the court settlement is the only realistic option for the sick, because Congress will never act.

“Ladies and gentlemen, you can wait and wait and wait for that legislation … it’s not passing,” Kenneth Feinberg, the former special master of the federal 9/11 victim compensation fund, told an audience of ground zero responders Monday in a meeting on Staten Island.

Democratic leaders opted to consider the House bill under a procedure that requires a two-thirds vote for approval rather than a simple majority. Such a move blocked potential GOP amendments to the measure.

A key backer of the bill, U.S. Rep. Peter King, a Long Island Republican, accused Democrats of staging a “charade.”

King said Democrats were “petrified” about casting votes as the fall elections near on controversial amendments, possibly including one that could ban the bill from covering illegal immigrants who were sickened by trade center dust.

If Democrats brought it to the floor as a regular bill, King said, it would have passed with majority support.

GOP critics branded the bill as yet another big-government “massive new entitlement program” that would have increased taxes and possibly kill jobs.

To pay the bill’s estimated $7.4 billion cost over 10 years, the legislation would have prevented foreign multinational corporations incorporated in tax haven countries from avoiding tax on income earned in the U.S.

Bill supporters said that would close a tax loophole. Republicans branded it a corporate tax increase.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the vote an “outrage.” He said it was clearly a tactic designed to stall the bill.

“This is a way to avoid having to make a tough decision,” Bloomberg said, adding that the nation owes more to “the people who worked down at 9/11 whose health has fallen apart because they did what America wanted them to do.”

John Feal, a ground zero demolition worker who has lobbied extensively for the legislation, expressed disgust.

“They pulled the rug out from beneath our feet,” Feal said. “Whatever member of Congress vote against this bill, whether Republican or Democrat, should go to jail for manslaughter.”

The bill would have provided up to $3.2 billion to cover the medical treatment of people sickened by trade center dust and an additional $4.2 billion for a new fund that would have compensated them for their suffering and lost wages.

The potential promise of a substantial payout from the federal government had caused some ground zero workers to balk at participating in the proposed legal settlement, which would resolve as many as 10,000 lawsuits against the city.

Initially, the bill would have prohibited people from participating in the new federal compensation program if they had already been compensated for their injuries through a lawsuit, but a change was made in recent days eliminating that restriction.

Nevertheless, with the House rejecting the bill and no vote scheduled on a similar Senate version, it appears almost guaranteed that there will be no new federal law by Sept. 8, the date by which ground zero workers involved in the lawsuits must decide whether to accept the settlement offer.

Under the terms of the deal, 95 percent of those workers must say yes for the court settlement to take effect.

The compensation system set up by the court would make payments ranging from $3,250 for people who aren’t sick but worry they could fall ill in the future to as much as $1.5 million to the families of people who have died. Nonsmokers disabled by severe asthma might get between $800,000 and $1 million.

About 25 percent of the money would go to pay legal fees. Contested claims would be heard by Feinberg, who would act as an appeals officer.

Researchers have found that thousands of New Yorkers exposed to trade center dust are now suffering from breathing difficulties similar to asthma. Many have also complained of heartburn or acid reflux, and studies have shown that firefighters who worked on the debris pile suffer from elevated levels of sarcoidosis, an inflammatory disease.

Many of the workers also fear that the dust is giving people cancer, although scientific studies have failed to find evidence of such a link.

The exact number of sick is unclear. Nearly 15,900 people received treatment last year through medical programs set up to treat Sept. 11-related illnesses, but doctors say many of those people suffered from conditions that are common in the general public.

The House bill is named for James Zadroga, a police detective who died at age 34. His supporters say he died from respiratory disease contracted at ground zero, but New York City’s medical examiner said Zadroga’s lung condition was caused by prescription drug abuse.

7 Responses to H.R. 847, James Zadroga 9/11 Health Bill Rejected by House Vote

  1. i like the way you write this article.keep it up.

  2. Joe Thompson says:

    I have real fears about the bill….do the first responders that are ill resulting from the event….YES!!! But, this country has a very bad reputation for malingerers and frauds…playing these types of events like so many lotteries….
    Second….If the bill is about healthcare for first responders….then why are there ANY other ammendments attached to it??? What is criminal is the way congress hides crap inside these highly emotion charged bills…and then cry foul when they don’t pass….

    If you want a healthcare bill for first responders…then propose a healthcare bill for first responders…DON’T cloud the waters with tax bills, loophole closures…or any damn thing you feel like….Make the bill stand on it’s own merit…and NOTHING ELSE…
    You sniveling weasels!!!!!!

  3. […] One change to the bill would have adjusted the funding for compensation. “To pay the bill’s estimated $7.4 billion [immediate] cost over 10 […]

  4. bummer says:

    We had a good opportunity to help those who cared enough to put themselves on the line for others.

  5. MaricrishK says:

    I Really think Joe is right if we want to a health care bill for first responders, see to it that it stand with its own merit, we are in a democratic country,
    but this we care for those who are sick of their job,and with it they totally get sick,
    the dust people breathed now comes from trade center,that causes breathing difficulties,

    how will all it happen? though we are in a democratic country we are not excempted to any illness that spread throughout, we need assurance of our health,though there are special health program that the government provided, its not enough that we always keep on depending to it!

    the day will come that everyone in the position will selfishly hold only what they own and get for their own sake!
    what I mean this is not a permanent thing will happen, there are changes in our law and we might not be counted anymore to the changes but for sure we are the most affected one if changes will go without our concern,
    the bill will cause our vote!

  6. earn youtube views…

    […]H.R. 847, James Zadroga 9/11 Health Bill Rejected by House Vote «[…]…

  7. joebobanana says:

    This should be an important lesson to everybody. Next time something like that happens, let them figure it out, and especially first responders, demand pay upfront.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: