Get 9/11 Truth’s Foot in Their Door


 
Targeting: The President of the United States, The U.S. Senate and The U.S. House of Representatives
 
Started by: Daniel Noel   source: Change.org   May 29, 2010

The censorship of the 9/11 false flag seems to have slightly cracked lately, especially outside the United States, with Richard Gage, AIA, presenting the World Trade Center demolitions to large audiences and getting favorable media reviews in Japan, Australia, New Zealand and Canada, and the Iranian government requesting that the United Nations investigate 9/11.

Evidently, our ultra-corrupt–or ultra-frigthened–congress and president are not ready to swallow 9/11 Truth. Some of them even claim ignorance of Building 7’s structural failure. But how about forcing them to take a few baby steps? Like having them face the fact that any high school kid will agree that the official technical investigation into the structural failure of Building 7 is less than satisfactory?

Remember that 9/11 Truth holds the key to just about every political problem and is very worthy of a few minutes of your time: http://www.meetup.com/OC-911-Truth/pages/Why_911_Truth%3F_Why_not_Work_on_Some_Other_Issue%3F/

READ   AND   SIGN   THE   PETITION   HERE

20 Responses to Get 9/11 Truth’s Foot in Their Door

  1. albury says:

    I think we should investigate Richard Gage, not the WTC collapses. The NIST engineers were only able to time the top 18 stories, or 242′, of the collapse of WTC 7, and determined that it took 5.4 seconds, yet he claims that the entire 610′ collapse only took ~6.5 seconds. Did the other 368′ fall in just over 1 second? How is he even able to give us a time for the entire visible portion of the collapse when NIST couldn’t because buildings in the foreground blocked the view of video cameras?
    How could the towers have free fallen when the loose, airborne debris from their upper stories was falling so much faster than the collapse zones, and began hitting the ground while at least 40 stories in each were still intact? Was g increased on 9/11? They fell in ~15 and ~22 seconds respectively, nowhere near the ~9.25 seconds free fall would have taken:
    http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4#p/u/40/qLShZOvxVe4
    yet he begins every presentation with his near free-fall claim. He’s also claimed that the dust clouds from the collapses were pyroclastic, but there are no reports of anyone’s skin being instantly peeled off, and he’s claimed that the fires in WTC 7 were minor, totally contradicting these NYC eyewitnesses:
    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofwtc7fires
    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/accountsofwtc7damage
    http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/eyewitnessaccountsofthewithdrawalfromwtc
    How could his claim that 400,000 yards of concrete were turned to fine powder be true, when there was <100,000 yards of concrete above grade in both towers combined? Does he know how to turn 400,000 yards of concrete to fine powder with explosives without leveling NYC?
    Has he ever seen a controlled demolition that left molten metal in the debris for months? Has he ever seen one that didn't leave even one explosively-cut column in the debris?
    We should investigate Richard, as well as his "engineers."
    http://forums.randi.org/showpost.php?p=3834688&postcount=12

    • norcaltruth says:

      Albury says:

      They fell in ~15 and ~22 seconds respectively, nowhere near the ~9.25 seconds free fall would have taken:

      Wow, 4 more seconds, and 12 more, than 9.25. 15 and 22 second collapses do NOT explain where 220 stories of steel and concrete went to. The nature of their explosiove collapse is self evident.
      Furthermore, if you want to believe that the towers came down in that manner of time, a fire still can not do that naturally. The speed (even 22 seconds) for 110 stories to disappear is not possible without explosive force.

      The freefall excelleration is admitted by NIST for Building numer 7, an “obvious controlled demolition.”

      Albury also says:

      he’s claimed that the fires in WTC 7 were minor, totally contradicting these NYC eyewitnesses

      We are working with many eyewitness testimony, including the ones about EXPLOSIONS, and even more so, the video evidence and even some official data. Maybe you dont know about Barry Jennings? Kevin McPadden?

      Albury finishes:

      Has he ever seen a controlled demolition that left molten metal in the debris for months?

      Have you ever seen a 1 hour fire produce molten metal for months?

  2. albury says:

    There were fires in the debris that lasted for months, not 1 hour, genius, and explosives don’t leave pools of molten steel, nor do incendiaries melt steel for more than a minute or two. How many controlled demolitions are done on buildings with major, multi-story fires in them?
    Box Boy is clearly lying about the collapse times for all 3 WTC buildings, and the time for WTC 7 is impossible to determine because the whole collapse isn’t seen on any video. 15 and 22 seconds for the towers are not “near free fall.”
    Where did all of this alleged molten steel come from, when not one partially-melted column was found in the debris?
    Why is McPadden the only one who heard this “countdown,” when it was allegedly on FDNY radio, and if Barry Jennings heard demolition explosives in the AM, why was Larry Silverstein discussing WHETHER to blow up WTC 7 in mid-PM? Wasn’t that decision already made? Why did his insurance companies pay him $4.68 BILLION? Why did one based in Zurich pay him $861 million just for WTC 7? You’re not “working with” eyewitnesses, you’re ignoring almost all of them.

    • norcaltruth says:

      The fires in the Towers kiddo. Those fires were an hour, and hour plus half respectively.

      But mentioning the extreme heat that existed in the rubble piles for MONTHS is another truth!

    • Open says:

      And of course… no cailivin in lower Manhattan noticed NWO agents running around, placing bloody chunks of human flesh in the street….hey chad is back!for those of you that are unfamiliar with chad, he replaced sword of truth, who replaced conspiracy smasher as this blog’s resident govt 9/11 fairytale cheerleader.no cailivin noticed NWO agents placing a wrong sized (not 767) jet engine on a sidewalk on church st. under a scaffold where it couldn’t possibly have landed, either, yet there it was, all set-up for photos. oh wait, who knows what any cailivin really noticed or not.also who is to say those are really bloody chunks of human flesh? it looks more like hamburger to me. where are the body parts? hands, heads, shoes, clothing, etc.

  3. albury says:

    Then you’re lying about the duration of the fires, unless you’re dumb enough to think the collapses extinguished them. And please tell me more about this other “truth.” What kind of explosives or incendiaries collapse buildings without leaving any severed steel behind, and then keep metal molten in the debris for months?

    • norcaltruth says:

      How long did Towers 1 and 2 burn before they collapsed in your world?

      Thats what I have been talking about if you aren’t following

  4. albury says:

    56 and 102 minutes. Are you really stupid enough to think that those fires cause molten metal in the debris for months? Since you said the following:
    “Have you ever seen a 1 hour fire produce molten metal for months,” you must be. Unbelievable…

    • norcaltruth says:

      My question to you:

      Have you ever seen a 1 hour fire produce molten metal for months

      Was an answer to your question.
      Which was:

      Has he ever seen a controlled demolition that left molten metal in the debris for months?

      Your response was:

      Are you really stupid enough to think that those fires cause molten metal

      And no, FONT might not have dispayed the sarcasim in my reponse question to you, I don’t think fires would create molten metal. But there WAS molten metal in the rubble, enough witnesses and pictures exist to prove that.

      So what was the molten metal about Albury?

      I would say thermite cutting steel is a great possibilty, and that fits with the controlled demoltiion scenario perfectly. Nano-thermtic particles were found in the dust – you know that.

    • Jonathan says:

      Dog town you are very sad. You need to call others rtderas to bolster your own ego.Just like you did at school I bet. The bullies always had emotional problems that drove them to do it.You joined the graby gang to think you are one of the cool kids. Ive seen the pictures, you are one of the geeks.

  5. albury says:

    No, I don’t know that, neither do you, and neither does anyone else, including your “researchers.” Aluminum, rust, sulfur, carbon, silicon, and some other chemical substances common to buildings and to nanothermite were found in the dust samples, and they weren’t even compared to known samples of nanothermite or anything else in the pay-to-publish Bentham farce. There is no proof of molten steel in the debris, no partially melted columns were found, and the molten metal was almost definitely aluminum or lead, both of which were in abundance in the buildings. It is absolutely absurd to think that explosives or incendiaries would have kept any metal molten for even an hour, let alone for months, and the debris fires, fueled by normal office materials, are very well documented.
    You don’t even have a motive for planting redundant, fireproof, imaginary explosives in the WTC, and you certainly don’t have any evidence. C/Ds cut columns, so why were none found by any of the 40,000 people who worked on the cleanup for ~8 months, either at Ground Zero, Fresh Kills, or the recycling centers? Were they all in on your imagined conspiracy?

    • norcaltruth says:

      You are so filled with Bullshit Albury, and that is why you are deleted and banned. Adios Amigo.

      If we are so wrong, why are you wasting your time?

      Every single sentance you said is a lie and packed with so much Bullshit Albury.

      No evidence of Molten Metal? No motive? Normal office material?

      Are you serious? Can you provide one photograph of any book, file, desk, phone, or body in the rubble? No? Maybe it’s because it was everything but a normal office fire, everything inside the towers was pulverized into particles that eventually covered Manhatten.

      You are not entitled to your own facts.

  6. albury says:

    I’m deleted and banned because you’re dishonest and incapable of arguing intelligently. If I’m “filled with Bullshit,” you should be able to prove it instead of running the other way.
    What could possibly have been planted in the WTC buildings that would have 1) secretly collapsed them, and 2) kept steel molten in the debris for months, even though no partially-melted columns were found?
    Jeezus, have you ever even taken a basic science course?

    • norcaltruth says:

      The proof is the thermite chips bud. The proof is in the video evidence. The proof is in the laws of physics. The proof is everywhere you look.

      But for a more technical perspective:

      Distinctive red/gray chips have been discovered in samples studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples.

      The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).

      The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present.

      The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite.

      Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips.

      The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

  7. albury says:

    Why didn’t your “researchers” present an exemplar of “unreacted thermitic material” in their Bentham paper for comparison? What was this stuff supposed to have done at the WTC? It didn’t sever any columns, or the columns would have been pulled from the debris with melted ends, and no suspiciously-cut steel was found in the debris of any of the collapsed WTC buildings. Do you honestly believe that explosives can be painted on columns and detonated to sever them? They apparently don’t, or they’d demonstrate it.

    • norcaltruth says:

      I could ask the same type question Albury!

      Why didn’t your “researchers” at NIST share Steel Samples, Dust Samples, or even their Computer Analysis Models Programming specifics?

      Again, if we were so wrong about the evidence, why are YOU WASTING YOUR TIME?

      Furthermore, if we are right about the evidence, why are you WASTING YOUR TIME?

      Get on the team, or get out the way.

      Start your own blog, and see if people care about what you have to say – like you care about what I, or others say on our sites.

  8. norcaltruth says:

    You being here is like pissing in the wind dude.

    Again, if we are so wrong – WHY ARE YOU HERE?

    More evidence that we are right and you are an agent of disruption

  9. norcaltruth says:

    Basically Albury- Because you are only here to disprupt.

    You have conceded nothing as far the evidence goes.

    You are your own world. And I dont care about it.

  10. albury says:

    It’s apparent that you don’t care much about the truth either, or you’d be more attentive to facts.
    Why don’t you start by explaing how Gage, Ryan, and others got 6.6 seconds for the collapse of WTC 7, when the NIST engineers could only time the top 242′?
    If that doesn’t prove to you that they’re liars and and completely incompetent, what will?
    Please feel free to tell me what could possibly have been planted in the WTC that would keep steel molten for months too, even though it didn’t cut even one column.

    • norcaltruth says:

      Albruy-
      YOU ARE 1984 ENCARNATE! Pure Double Speak and Lies! Its amazing. You are aso obviously an agent of disruption.

      Lets see….You dont believe there are pictures of steel beams with cuts in them, so what I am supposed to do. There are PLENTY of photos. You have come up with your own collapse time for the buildings. You dont heed all the eyewitness testimony to molten metal at the ground zero rubble pile. You dont think there are witnesses to explosions or countdowns, the ones that testify to this you blow off as faulty….
      You are a joke.

      Lety me ask you one more question to entertain you.

      Did a fireball blow through the elevators and break all the lobby windows as well?

      As you know (but probably deny) the lobby windows were shattered. Yet there was no fire damage in the lobby, beyond that, the functioning of the elevators would have made a “fireball” physically impossible.
      Unless you want to claim that someone led the fireball off one elevator onto another, opening and closing all the doors on the way as the elevators themselves would stop a fireball shooting down and most elevators did not go to the lobby to upper floors.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: