Appointment of Admiral Seen as key in 9/11 Trial Switch

Obama said everything he needed to say to have millions of people vote for his Presidency, none of it, absolutely none of it ever meant anything. I hope those who voted for him start taking their bumber stickers off soon, it makes me sick to see all of this false hope; it is as bad as seeing John McCain stickers or the occasional  W’ 04 stickers.

source: Washinton Times   May 18, 2010

The appointment of a well-respected ex-Navy lawyer to oversee war-crime trials is being seen in military legal circles as a sign the Obama administration might reverse its decision to bring Khalid Shaikh Mohammed to New York for a civilian trial.

At the same time, a pending speedy-trial ruling in a second terror case in New York could give Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. an escape route through which he could switch the trial of Shaikh Mohammed (KSM) from federal court back to a military system set up by former President George W. Bush and Congress.

In February, the White House and Mr. Holder left open the possibility of a war-crimes trial for Shaikh Mohammed, the admitted 9/11 attack mastermind. This would reverse Mr. Holder’s much-criticized decision in November to bring the al Qaeda heavyweight to the federal court system, where he would enjoy more rights and perhaps a media forum for anti-American propaganda.

A month after the administration signaled a reversal, the Pentagon, with significant White House input, named retired Navy Vice Adm. Bruce MacDonald as the war-crimes convening authority. In that post, the Navy’s former top lawyer is the official who brings criminal charges, selects jury pools, approves defense- lawyer expenses and makes other rulings.

Charles Stimson, the Pentagon’s director of detainee affairs in the Bush administration and who still monitors terror prosecutions as a legal analyst at the Heritage Foundation, noted the significance of the MacDonald appointment.

“Picking Bruce does not prove that KSM is going to commission, but what it does show is that Bruce would not have taken the leap if he did not think he was going to get some substantive cases, because he’s a worker guy. He likes real work,” said Mr. Stimson. “And the White House and [Defense Department General Counsel] Jeh Johnson would not have asked Bruce to come over.”

Added Mr. Stimson, a former prosecutor and currently a Navy reserve judge advocate: “They are essentially bringing ‘Michael Jordan’ in to head up commissions. And what that tells you is that they either want Michael Jordan there to handle the relatively uninteresting cases, or they’re bringing him in because they want to be prepared if and when they have to relent and send KSM back there for lack of a better political option. So they want to have the A Team in place.”

Adm. MacDonald has a master’s degree in international law from Harvard University. He rose to the rank of three-star admiral and the Navy’s top uniformed lawyer. He has provided advice to Congress and the Pentagon on detainee affairs.

Retired Brig. Gen. Thomas Hemingway agreed that Adm. MacDonald would not have taken the job unless he expected to oversee major terror cases. Gen. Hemingway, who was recalled to active duty in 2003 to become the chief legal adviser to the then-convening authority, said moving KSM back to a tribunal is “the right decision to make.”

There is a bunch of bull back at the original article. You know the type: “Military Tribunals are right, better, more open, safe, and improved” …

3 Responses to Appointment of Admiral Seen as key in 9/11 Trial Switch

  1. john says:

    Hello All,

    The dark pit of military tribunals will not only obscure the truth, but will ensure for the worst representation of jurisprudence possible.

    Here’s a partial comment from a reader of the original article at the Washington Times:

    ‘They do not differentiate civilians from military and government, they do not except children as targets or as combatants…’

    One might think the writer was discussing the nature of US drone attacks on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border. (some of which occur from Nellis AFB) But no, this was more of the same neanderthal knee-jerk language designed to justify to the simplistic mind the blatant actions of an Imperialistic ideology. It is a horrible disappointment to reflect on the long term lies, collusion (false flag) and absolute misanthropy propagated by our leaders—-particularly the ‘shadow’ leaders, whose morality has long since drained from their being.

    Keep up the good work Brian (and whoever else is involved)

  2. norcaltruth says:

    I can only hope that the nano-thermite evidence, or some videos from David Chandler find their way into the courtroom.

    Of course, I am not holding my breath….

  3. monster says:

    well written comment by john. it’s great to see dialogue form in all its modern ways.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: